But only if you continue to ignore that there are other IPv4 sharing mechanisms than NAT.
Ole > On 1 Aug 2018, at 16:11, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: > > We all understand that many current NAT devices and their deployments are not > compatible with IP fragmentation (v4 or v6). > > That leaves us with two options: > 1. change IP, but that leaves us with problems for which we have no > solution (encrypted payloads, other DPI devices that look further in, etc.) > 2. change NATs and how they’re deployed (to require reassembly or its > equivalent before processing, to not be deployed except where they can act as > the host they proxy for) > > Both cost money and will have an impact. > > #2 involves changing less devices AND has the benefit that we know it will > work. > > I see no good reason to continue to try #1 in the meantime. > > Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
