On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, vineet deshpande wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted the updated version on the draft for IP address space
reclassification. Kindly review.
I started reading your draft:
"An AI based TCP IP model describes how Big Data is centered"
I then proceeded to try to read the rest of the draft. It's completely
full of buzzwords that I do not know what they mean concretely, and it
renders the document impossible for me to understand.
I've been involved in Internet routing for 20 years now, and sections such
as:
" o The Big Data bottleneck lies between different Autonomous
Systems. Due to the implicit life cycle between a Network,
Internet and the Cloud which is time bound and unidirectional,
the Network also needs to grow and scale to the Cloud to reap
the benefits of Cloud such as Datacenter virtualization,
scaling and high availability."
I just don't understand.
" o For such scaling to occur from both ends a Virtual address
space is needed in between. The limitations brought about by
the present classification of IP address space into public,
private and the almost mandatory usage of NAT in the Internet
and Cloud architecture leads to suggest that translating or
mapping of the IP address into another Virtual address space
cannot be avoided."
"almost mandatory usage of NAT". This is being restored to originally
intended state by IPv6 where we do not need NAT anymore (NAT wasn't a
thing until around 2000, before that we didn't do any NAT).
" o The Network cannot be de-classified from the cloud. The
Network needs to grow and scale towards the Cloud."
"The Cloud" is just someone elses computer. Virtualising something doesn't
change anything concretely from it being run on metal.
Please re-write the draft and use concrete terms instead of just a lot of
buzzwords.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
