Hi All,
I have re-written the document removing the buzz words and have added a
glossary for any terms used. Request review.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deshpande-intarea-ipaddress-reclassification/
Thanks & Regards,Vineet Deshpande
On Friday, 5 October 2018, 7:14:44 am GMT+5:30, Joe Touch
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/2/2018 5:58 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> NAT was invented to handle IPv4 exhaustion.
Perhaps, but at least part of the benefit is a way to enforce the
distinction between consumer and commercial-grade Internet (where you
can't run a server behind a NAT).
> With IPv6 there is no address shortage, so no need for NAT to avoid
> address limitations.
Not those, but to enforce the artificial consumer/commercial
distinction, there is and will be.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
