Optimal route reflector usage with clusters should be the benefit. TIR analogy for the same. I have made sufficient design recommendations which I thought were useful. If found to be not useful that is fine and I will delay discussion till some practical proof of benefit is found or POC is built. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 19:36, Joe Touch<[email protected]> wrote: Vineet,
On Oct 17, 2018, at 12:27 AM, vineet deshpande <[email protected]> wrote: Thanks for your feedback. Answers inline: ----- Section 2: > MIMO can occur with refraction or partial reflection; it does not need total internal reflection - Singlecore fiber transmission is essentially equivalent to SISO. Multicore is equivalent to MIMO. Both use single transmitters and single receivers, thus neither is MIMO. If you have a point to make, you need to explain why you think your analogy is useful and correct. Both are based on TIR. The reference to TIR is wrt to spartial frequency and not temporal frequency. Fibers use TIR but MIMO exists without fibers. If there is a point to your analogy, you need to explain why this issue (TIR) is relevant. > MIMO requires multiple transmitters, whereas multipath routing can be > leveraged using only one network interface - If a multicore optic fiber has > multiple cores similar to MIMO It is not, as I have explained. You have not explained otherwise. This is the problem with your discussion in general. Simply repeating a statement doesn’t make it either correct or useful as an analogy. If you want to engage further, you need to use analogies that begin as being correct and end as being useful. Joe
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
