Hi Joe, all, The various techniques discussed in draft-ietf-softwire-yang were specified in the softwire WG. This is why we are defining in softwire WG, not in another WG, a YANG module for these techniques.
Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Joe Touch > Envoyé : vendredi 26 octobre 2018 16:40 > À : tom petch > Cc : [email protected] > Objet : Re: [Int-area] registering tunnel types > > Tom, > > Tunnels seem to be ubiquitous in the IETF, as in the Internet. > > IMO: > A over B, which is typically more like A over X over B (requiring a > shim), belongs where A belongs. > > The point is that this tunnel is trying to create a new version of service A > that needs to behave exactly like A. It typically isn’t changing B. > > That said, if there are extensions to B required, then they need ALSO be > reviewed where B belongs, but IMO only in concert with A being where A > belongs. > > I.e., that’s why the IP over * tunnels draft (draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels) is > in intarea. > > Joe > > > > On Oct 26, 2018, at 5:05 AM, tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I am not sure where tunnels have a home in the IETF but for anyone with > > an interest in them, draft-ietf-softwire-yang, having completed IETF > > Last Call two weeks ago, has since acquired a YANG module for tunnel > > types, based on the Tunnel MIB, RFC4087, which seems not to have been > > turned into a YANG module before. > > > > I am unsure where the place to discuss such a topic is; softwires, which > > owns the I-D containing the module, would be the place for aplusp but > > perhaps not for the others. I have forwarded this to 6man thinking that > > they would have an interest. > > > > The I-D has been revised five times since Last Call completed and I have > > suggested that it needs to go back to softwires for them to agree this > > is really what they want before the I-D goes any further. > > > > Tom Petch > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Int-area mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
