On 2019-09-04 08:29, Bob Hinden wrote:
....
> This text has been through IETF last call and IESG review, and as far as I
> can tell is factually correct. Unless we want to repeat that, better to not
> remove it in my view.
Repeating it up front was through WG and IETF last call.
If IESG review has a problem with a given part of the doc, it's fair
game to open up other parts to address the change. There are no truly
local changes.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
