> -----Original Message-----
> From: Int-area <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Donald Eastlake
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2023 20:21
> To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Murray S. Kucherawy
> <[email protected]>; Francesca Palombini
> <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-intarea-
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] The CBOR section of draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis...
>
>
> > I welcome feedback from the community on this question: should section
> 2.4 be in draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis ?
>
> I would point out that this was discussed in the CBOR WG. See, in particular
> the thread starting at
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/I49hlrHka1BUPAq8oCtO77xElvc/
> including the message at
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/h2FGrQ7Uw0PX4NdHO7Rn07rCb
> tI/
> which indicates that it was decided "to leave Ethernet tags for Donald's
> rfc7042bis".
>
[LI] Don, thanks for these links. I will put them in the shepherd's write-up
once this thread is over. I think is important information worth to be added.
Ciao
L.
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
