Hi, I’ve just updated the writeup to track the discussion about section 2.4. This can be found in bullet 5 of the writeup: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis/shepherdwriteup/
Ciao L. > On Sep 14, 2023, at 15:09, Luigi IANNONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Int-area <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Donald Eastlake >> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2023 20:21 >> To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Murray S. Kucherawy >> <[email protected]>; Francesca Palombini >> <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-intarea- >> [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Int-area] The CBOR section of draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis... >> >> >>> I welcome feedback from the community on this question: should section >> 2.4 be in draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis ? >> >> I would point out that this was discussed in the CBOR WG. See, in particular >> the thread starting at >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/I49hlrHka1BUPAq8oCtO77xElvc/ >> including the message at >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/h2FGrQ7Uw0PX4NdHO7Rn07rCb >> tI/ >> which indicates that it was decided "to leave Ethernet tags for Donald's >> rfc7042bis". >> > > [LI] Don, thanks for these links. I will put them in the shepherd's write-up > once this thread is over. I think is important information worth to be added. > > Ciao > > L.
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
