Hi Marcus, Is your implementation code available?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 8:32 AM Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar= [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I support the adoption of this work. It is an important tool for enabling > discovery of proxies in a local network as well as learning properties of > known proxies. > > Having implemented an earlier version of this draft both on client and > proxy side I am happy to see that the design in 02 has improved to use > explicit protocol fields. > > This work is relevant and needed, and I will gladly contribute with text, > reviews and interop testing. > > > > BR > > Marcus Ihlar > > > > *From:* Int-area <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Juan Carlos > Zuniga (juzuniga) > *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 April 2024 11:37 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Int-area] Call for WG adoption of > draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-02 > > > > Dear IntArea WG, > > > > As agreed at the IETF 119 meeting, we are starting a 2-week call for > adoption of the Communicating Proxy Configurations in Provisioning > Domains draft: > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-02.html > > > > The document has been discussed for some time and it received a string > support for adoption, so this is a confirmation call. > > > > If you have an opinion on whether this document should be adopted or not > by the IntArea WG, please indicate it on the list by the end of Wednesday > April 24th (AoE). > > > > Thanks, > > > > Juan-Carlos & Wassim > > (IntArea WG chairs) > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > -- --- *Josh Co*hen
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
