I support adoption. At Google we're interested in potentially using draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd to configure MASQUE proxies and VPNs. I can commit to reviewing the document as it progresses, and I'll try to see if we can also participate in interop efforts. David
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:37 AM Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <juzuniga= [email protected]> wrote: > Dear IntArea WG, > > > > As agreed at the IETF 119 meeting, we are starting a 2-week call for > adoption of the Communicating Proxy Configurations in Provisioning > Domains draft: > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-02.html > > > > The document has been discussed for some time and it received a string > support for adoption, so this is a confirmation call. > > > > If you have an opinion on whether this document should be adopted or not > by the IntArea WG, please indicate it on the list by the end of Wednesday > April 24th (AoE). > > > > Thanks, > > > > Juan-Carlos & Wassim > > (IntArea WG chairs) > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
