> I have one comment though: the document implies that ARP and ND are always > necessary,
Done. (It took me a while to find a wording that is precise enough without making the document too heavy, but I think it's okay now.) > Also, I would suggest adding text to the security consideration section that > notes that routers using v4-over-v6 routing and don't have IPv4 addresses > difficult or impossible to attack from the IPv4 Internet or using IPv4 > packets, improving the security posture. I agree that's what happens in practice, but v4-via-v6 is not a security mechanism, and I think we should not be misleading people into thinking it is. Thanks, -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
