Randomly chiming in to say I don't understand the discussion point about ethertype. Is that not merely an implementation detail of one particular vendor?
Kevin On 21 May 2026 20:22:05 CEST, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <[email protected]> wrote: >Dear authors, > >As you may have read, the IESG evaluation [1] of today did not approve the >draft as it is. > >One key issue to be solved is the reference to RFC 7600, it is suggested to >simply remove the reference to this experimental RFC and directly point to the >IANA registry of special IPv4 addresses[2] > >Looking forward to reading a revised I-D and the discussion with the >DISCUSSing ADs. > >Regards > >-éric > >[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6/ballot/ >[2] >https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv4-special-registry/iana-ipv4-special-registry.xhtml#iana-ipv4-special-registry-1
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
