You could, if you updated DHCP, which you'd have to do anyway to utilize
this proposal
On 18/06/2026 19:09, Remco van Mook wrote:
Hi Kevin,
for one thing. you can't put an IPv6 next hop in a DHCPv4 Router Option (option
code 3) reply.
Kind regards,
Remco
On 18 Jun 2026, at 18:58, Kevin Tillery <[email protected]> wrote:
Still don't understand why you can't do it with regular IPv6 next hop (or
whatever that's officially called).
Maybe someone with operational experience can chime in?
Kevin
On 17/06/2026 10:33, Remco van Mook wrote:
Hi all,
I would like the members of this WG to support adoption of
draft-vanmook-intarea-ipv6-resolved-gateway. -01 has just been submitted,
addressing feedback received both on-list and in=person since -00.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vanmook-intarea-ipv6-resolved-gateway/
I would welcome any remaining feedback before Vienna. The chairs have indicated
they will issue an adoption call after IETF 126 if there is sufficient list and
room consensus.
Kind regards
Remco
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
