In your previous mail you wrote: I see two issues. The first is to make sure there are enough cautionary words in the draft to insure no one thinks these are intended to be put into packets and routed. The general topic of allocating addresses that are not CIDR routable has caused a lot of controversy in the past (e.g., ULA discussions). The second is that while it is may be OK to allocate a block of IPv6 addresses for this experiment, I don't think we would want to have multiple experiments all wanting a separate allocation. I was thinking we could allocate a block of IPv6 non-routable addresses for experimental purposes and this proposal could then use that block. This would allow other experiments to use the addresses at the same time. => the draft is supposed to address both issues. For the first one we can add more cautionary words if one believes there are not yet enough. For the second one we already merged two very different experiments into one request.
Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
