James, I don't believe that cellular type systems use any shared media functionality - they've already gone down to the path of p2p links for various reasons. As I already said in a few of my earlier emails, the prefix-per-MN model is inline with the cellular system operation.
Vidya > -----Original Message----- > From: James Kempf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 10:55 AM > To: Narayanan, Vidya; marcelo bagnulo braun > Cc: Alexandru Petrescu; INT Area; - > Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv6 addressing model, per-MN subnet > prefix,and broadcast domain > > Vidya, > > > At the moment, I'm very skeptical about slapping a point-to-point > > model on shared media - I'll wait for some text to see if I can > > convince myself :) > > What services do you propose to use in a cellular type system > that require shared media functionality, such as broadcast > and link local multicast? Can you give some examples of such > services on existing cellular type systems, such as UTRAN or cdma2K? > > jak > > > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
