Templin, Fred L wrote:
I was referring to multicast RAs for purposes of SLAAC. If you did
stateful address configuration and used RAs only to advertise default
router, that is different.
Its not only about stateful address configuration; unsolicited
RAs with incomplete information can be followed by an RS/RA
exchange where the RA contains prefixes for SLAAC.
I kind of see how this would work. A quirk may be with RS being sent to
multicast only, by 2461:
Destination Address
Typically the all-routers multicast address.
Point-to-point links are usually non multicast capable.
If one needs an unicast solicitation, then that would better be a NS not RS.
But yes, ok,
Alex
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
