Alexandru Petrescu writes: > > I'm not exactly sure what you mean by RAs with "incomplete > > information". In any case, the above design seems weird to me. For > > one, there is no reason a host should send an RS right after it > > received an unsolicited RA. > > Well, if the router puts a short lifetime in the periodic partial RA > (partial, incomplete would mean only the default router address) then > the host will necessarily do an RS after that lifetime and get an RA > that would contain only prefix (no default router address) with a much > longer lifetime. I think it's implementable.
Only if you modify the hosts to introduce new behavior, as what you describe above is not the RFC 2461 specified behavior. -Dave _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
