Fred,

I don't think this quite captures the situation.

First off, a prefix advertised in an RA is not assigned to an end node, it is assigned to a link. A prefix can only rightly be considered to be assigned to a node when it is delegated via DHCP, this allows the node to then assign the prefix to links downstream, or delegate further if the prefix isn't a /64.

Secondly, exactly what is meant by 'L=0' is underspecified by RFC 2461. I think everyone agrees with 'L=1' means, that the prefix is only being advertised to nodes that are on this physical link. Any effort to tighten up the definitoin of 'L=0' is going to need wider discussion with the ipv6 WG and possibly might impact RFC2461bis. This draft is currently in AD Evauation:Revised Draft Needed.

Thirdly, this doesn't discuss at all link forwarding considerations, particularly with regard to link local multicast (i.e. forwarding of traffic to link local multicast addresses). As we've discussed offlist, exactly how link local multicast forwarding works for NETLMM is an open question at this point. I started another thread on that for comment. So far, the thread hasn't been very active.

           jak

----- Original Message ----- From: "Templin, Fred L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "INT Area" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Templin, Fred L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 4:46 PM
Subject: [netlmm] Multilink Subnet Considerations for NETLMM Addressing


Having been away from e-mail for the past several days, the
text below is offered to cover the NETLMM Addressing concerns.

This would naturally go as replacement text for Section 5 of
'draft-ietf-netlmm-mn-ar-if-01.txt', but may be appropriate
for other documents as well. Comments?

Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"5.  Multilink Subnet Considerations

An individual prefix is an IP prefix associated with a specific
MN, and a shared prefix is an IP prefix that may be associated
with multiple MNs.

ARs must not include an individual prefix in RAs that may be
received by a MN other than the one associated with the prefix.

ARs must not send RAs that include a shared prefix in a Prefix
Information Option with 'A'=1 unless there is operational assurance
of duplicate address detection/avoidance across the NETLMM domain.

ARs must not send RAs that include an individual or shared prefix
in a Prefix Information Option with 'L'=1 unless all RAs that
include the prefix and all MNs that receive them are associated
with a single link."

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm



_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to