> From: Pekka Savola, October 19, 2007 5:10 AM > To: Alper Yegin > Cc: 'Internet Area' > > On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Alper Yegin wrote: > > There does not appear to be a strong justification to hack DHCP the > > way you are proposing. Many people spoke against that already. > > FWIW, Cisco has claimed IPR on the DHCP solution: > > http://www1.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/cisco-ipr-draft-pruss-dhcp-auth- > dsl-00.txt > > I wonder if other solutions are similarly affected. > > Just something to chew on when looking at potentially > applicable solutions... >
Well, since you brought it up... Binding of DHCP and PANA... http://tinyurl.com/yvjx9l Triggering DHCP actions from IEEE 802.1x state changes... http://tinyurl.com/2avgk2 If you spend ten minutes on the USPTO website, you will quickly see that all of this technology has claims on it, far more than on the IETF IPR website. http://www.uspto.gov/patft/ "Results of Search in US Patent Collection db for: (DSL AND Authentication): 953 patents." "Results of Search in US Patent Collection db for: ((EAP AND Network) AND Access): 146 patents." At least Cisco disclosed its IPR to the IETF. Eric > -- > Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the > Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." > Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
