> From: Yoshihiro Ohba, October 18, 2007 7:37 PM > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:59:05PM -0400, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote: > > > > Any standardized DHCP Auth mechanism shouldn't preclude this. In > > fact, non-standard 802.1x implementations have already blazed this > > trail. EAP over 802.1x credential failure can allow the > access port > > to be allocated to a guest VLAN instead of the access port > going into > > a port-blocked mode. Likewise, DHCP Auth EAP credential > failure could > > result in the L3 edge assigning the subscriber a non-public > IP Address, and associating > > the customer with a diagnostic VRF (w/ 911 support of course). > > Then how is DHCP auth different from PANA in terms of debugging?
? Compare the number of total state transitions between CPE boot & operation; compare the operational delta from existing/embedded DHCP Option 82 deployments. > Yoshihiro Ohba > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
