> > > > > > > > > I don't know how DSLF progressed from "requirements stage" > > > (previous contact with IETF) to "serious interest in one solution > > > stage". > > > > Speaking as a participant in the DSLF I can say that all of the > > candidate mechanism have been presented previously (and in > some cases > > repeatedly so too) but no progress has been made in > adopting one nor > > in obtaining liaison replies from other SDOs to their > previous requests. > > Hence the DSLF chose to express it's "serious interest" > more clearly. > > Can you point to some meeting minutes or other material where > EAP/DHCP was evaluated against the other solutions and got > into the liaison letter? That background would help IETF to > understand if EAP/DHCP is justified, at all...
Am afraid that the meeting minutes are published/accessible to DSLF members, and it's not within my authority to circulate them - I guess it would require a decision by the DSLF to do so. That said, the DSLF has issued previous liaison statements to the IETF on the topic on more than one occasion... -Woj. > > Alper > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
