> > I think that depends on what you mean by "IPv6 deployment". > > IMHO, IPv6 deployment as endpoint identifiers is a MUST but > > disruption of the IPv4 Internet is a SHOULD NOT. > > Agreed that IPv4 must not be disrupted.
OK. > What I meant to say is really all the work items for providing new > features to IPv4. Example in the IPv4 mobility area. Clearly, I disagree. IMHO, IPv6 as endpoint identifiers and IPv4 in-the-network is the right fit for growing the Internet; see for example the RRG work. Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
