Templin, Fred L wrote: >>> I think that depends on what you mean by "IPv6 deployment". >>> IMHO, IPv6 deployment as endpoint identifiers is a MUST but >>> disruption of the IPv4 Internet is a SHOULD NOT. >> Agreed that IPv4 must not be disrupted. > > OK. > >> What I meant to say is really all the work items for providing new >> features to IPv4. Example in the IPv4 mobility area. > > Clearly, I disagree. IMHO, IPv6 as endpoint identifiers > and IPv4 in-the-network is the right fit for growing > the Internet; see for example the RRG work.
See it indeed. See the open questions list. See what open questions aren't there. See which open questions are classic distributed-systems show-stoppers. See which missing open questions are too. Then decide whether "right fit" is a conclusion. Joe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
