My PIPE_CONTROL fix (just sent via Eric's tree) was buggy; I was
testing a whole set of patches together and missed a conversion to the
new HAS_PIPE_CONTROL macro, which will cause breakage on non-Ironlake
965 class chips.  Fortunately, the fix is trivial and has been tested.

Be sure to use the HAS_PIPE_CONTROL macro in i915_get_gem_seqno, or
we'll end up reading the wrong graphics memory, likely causing hangs,
crashes, or worse.

Reported-by: Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Toralf Förster <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Toralf Förster <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 7f52cc1..ef3d91d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1793,7 +1793,7 @@ i915_get_gem_seqno(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
        drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 
-       if (IS_I965G(dev))
+       if (HAS_PIPE_CONTROL(dev))
                return ((volatile u32 *)(dev_priv->seqno_page))[0];
        else
                return READ_HWSP(dev_priv, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX);
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to