intel-gfx
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Messages by Thread
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Luca Coelho
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Tvrtko Ursulin
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Coelho, Luciano
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Tvrtko Ursulin
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Coelho, Luciano
Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Rodrigo Vivi
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/2] Resolve suspend-resume racing with GuC destroy-context-worker
Alan Previn
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Flush context destruction worker at suspend
Alan Previn
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 2/2] drm/i915/guc: Close deregister-context race against CT-loss
Alan Previn
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Resolve suspend-resume racing with GuC destroy-context-worker (rev7)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [Patch v3 1/2] drm/i915: Move reg_in_range_table
Matt Atwood
[Intel-gfx] [Patch v3 2/2] drm/i915: Introduce Wa_1401127433
Matt Atwood
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v3,1/2] drm/i915: Move reg_in_range_table
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [v3,1/2] drm/i915: Move reg_in_range_table
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v3,1/2] drm/i915: Move reg_in_range_table
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Luca Coelho
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160
Alan Previn
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v4,1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] Intel Arc 770m GPU won't load on Fedora 38 kernel versions > 6.4.12
Kevin Quillen
Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel Arc 770m GPU won't load on Fedora 38 kernel versions > 6.4.12
Jani Nikula
[Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Jani Nikula
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Hamza Mahfooz
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Jani Nikula
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Maxime Ripard
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Javier Martinez Canillas
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Jani Nikula
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Javier Martinez Canillas
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Maxime Ripard
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Javier Martinez Canillas
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Patchwork
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem
Thomas Zimmermann
Re: [Intel-gfx] 回复: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: correct the input parameter on _intel_dsb_commit()
Jani Nikula
[Intel-gfx] [RESEND] drm/i915/syncmap: squelch a sparse warning
Jani Nikula
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND] drm/i915/syncmap: squelch a sparse warning
Rodrigo Vivi
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/syncmap: squelch a sparse warning (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/syncmap: squelch a sparse warning (rev2)
Patchwork
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/syncmap: squelch a sparse warning (rev2)
Jani Nikula
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: use PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL() for bool members
Jani Nikula
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: add bool type checks in PIPE_CONF_CHECK_*
Jani Nikula
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: add bool type checks in PIPE_CONF_CHECK_*
Rodrigo Vivi
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: use PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL() for bool members
Rodrigo Vivi
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915: use PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL() for bool members
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 1/1] drm/i915/display: Don't use "proxy" headers
Andy Shevchenko
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 1/1] drm/i915/display: Don't use "proxy" headers
Jani Nikula
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v1,1/1] drm/i915/display: Don't use "proxy" headers (rev2)
Patchwork
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v1,1/1] drm/i915/display: Don't use "proxy" headers (rev2)
Jani Nikula
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/hwmon: Fix static analysis tool errors in i915 hwmon
Karthik Poosa
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/hwmon: Fix static analysis tool errors in i915 hwmon
Jani Nikula
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix static analysis tool errors in i915 hwmon
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix static analysis tool errors in i915 hwmon
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Luca Coelho
Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Rodrigo Vivi
Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Coelho, Luciano
Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Rodrigo Vivi
Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available
Coelho, Luciano
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/4] pwm: rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()
Sean Young
[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915/dgfx: DGFX uses direct VBT pin mapping
Lucas De Marchi
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dgfx: DGFX uses direct VBT pin mapping (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier
Jonathan Cavitt
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/4] Prepare intel_fb for Xe
Jouni Högander
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 1/4] drm/i915/display: use intel_bo_to_drm_bo in intel_fb.c
Jouni Högander
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 2/4] drm/i915/display: Convert intel_fb_modifier_to_tiling as non-static
Jouni Högander
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 4/4] drm/i915/display: Split i915 specific code away from intel_fb.c
Jouni Högander
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 4/4] drm/i915/display: Split i915 specific code away from intel_fb.c
Ville Syrjälä
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 3/4] drm/i915/display: Handle invalid fb_modifier in intel_fb_modifier_to_tiling
Jouni Högander
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Prepare intel_fb for Xe (rev8)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Prepare intel_fb for Xe (rev8)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Prepare intel_fb for Xe (rev8)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
Weixi Zhu
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
Christian König
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
Dave Airlie
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
zhuweixi
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
Christian König
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
zhuweixi
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
Christian König
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
Christian König
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
Zeng, Oak
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
Christian König
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
zhuweixi
[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 2/6] mm/gmem: add arch-independent abstraction to track address mapping status
Weixi Zhu
Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 2/6] mm/gmem: add arch-independent abstraction to track address mapping status
zhuweixi
[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 5/6] mm/gmem: resolve VMA conflicts for attached peer devices
Weixi Zhu
[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 1/6] mm/gmem: add heterogeneous NUMA node
Weixi Zhu
[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 4/6] mm/gmem: add new syscall hmadvise() to issue memory hints for heterogeneous NUMA nodes
Weixi Zhu
[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 3/6] mm/gmem: add GMEM (Generalized Memory Management) interface for external accelerators
Weixi Zhu
[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 6/6] mm/gmem: extending Linux core MM to support unified virtual address space
Weixi Zhu
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error
Vignesh Raman
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error
Manivannan Sadhasivam
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error
Vignesh Raman
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error
Manivannan Sadhasivam
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error
Jani Nikula
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error
Manivannan Sadhasivam
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error
Vignesh Raman
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error
Jani Nikula
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error
Vignesh Raman
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for PCI: qcom: Fix compile error
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for PCI: qcom: Fix compile error
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: cdclk/voltage_level cleanups and fixes
Ville Syrjala
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/cdclk: s/-1/~0/ when dealing with unsigned values
Ville Syrjala
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/cdclk: Give the squash waveform length a name
Ville Syrjala
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/cdclk: Remove the assumption that cd2x div==2 when using squashing
Ville Syrjala
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/cdclk: Rewrite cdclk->voltage_level selection to use tables
Ville Syrjala
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/mtl: Fix voltage_level for cdclk==480MHz
Ville Syrjala
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Split intel_ddi_compute_min_voltage_level() into platform variants
Ville Syrjala
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/mtl: Calculate the correct voltage level from port_clock
Ville Syrjala
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Simplify intel_ddi_compute_min_voltage_level()
Ville Syrjala
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: cdclk/voltage_level cleanups and fixes
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: cdclk/voltage_level cleanups and fixes
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: wait for active idle event in i915_active_unlock_wait
Andrzej Hajda
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: wait for active idle event in i915_active_unlock_wait
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix IP version of the WAs
Balasubramani Vivekanandan
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix IP version of the WAs
Gustavo Sousa
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix IP version of the WAs
Matt Roper
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix IP version of the WAs
Matt Roper
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Fix IP version of the WAs
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] QGV/SAGV related fixes
Stanislav Lisovskiy
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Extract code required to calculate max qgv/psf gv point
Stanislav Lisovskiy
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Add meaningful traces for QGV point info error handling
Stanislav Lisovskiy
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Add meaningful traces for QGV point info error handling
Gustavo Sousa
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Disable SAGV on bw init, to force QGV point recalculation
Stanislav Lisovskiy
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Disable SAGV on bw init, to force QGV point recalculation
Stanislav Lisovskiy
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for QGV/SAGV related fixes
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for QGV/SAGV related fixes
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for QGV/SAGV related fixes
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for QGV/SAGV related fixes (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for QGV/SAGV related fixes (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for QGV/SAGV related fixes (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160
Alan Previn
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v3,1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [v3,1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160
Patchwork
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160
Matt Roper
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160
Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dg2: Drop Wa_22014600077
Matt Roper
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dg2: Drop Wa_22014600077
Gustavo Sousa
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dg2: Drop Wa_22014600077
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/dg2: Drop Wa_22014600077
Patchwork
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/dg2: Drop Wa_22014600077
Matt Roper
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode
Mika Kahola
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode
Jani Nikula
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode
Gustavo Sousa
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode
Kahola, Mika
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode
Gustavo Sousa
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode
Kahola, Mika
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode
Mika Kahola
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] TTM improvement and amdgpu fix
Christian König
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v3
Christian König
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: use GTT only as fallback for VRAM|GTT
Christian König
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: use GTT only as fallback for VRAM|GTT
Hamza Mahfooz
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: use GTT only as fallback for VRAM|GTT
Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: use GTT only as fallback for VRAM|GTT
Christian König
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v3
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v3
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v3
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v3
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders
Ville Syrjala
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/mst: Fix .mode_valid_ctx() return values
Ville Syrjala
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/mst: Fix .mode_valid_ctx() return values
Jani Nikula
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/mst: Reject modes that require the bigjoiner
Ville Syrjala
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/mst: Reject modes that require the bigjoiner
Jani Nikula
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Clean up some DISPLAY_VER checks
Ville Syrjala
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Clean up some DISPLAY_VER checks
Jani Nikula
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders
Patchwork
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders
Jani Nikula
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders
Ville Syrjälä
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders
Jani Nikula
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders
Ville Syrjälä
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix null pointer dereference in intel_dp_aux_wait_done and intel_dp_aux_xfer
Kunwu Chan
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix null pointer dereference in intel_dp_aux_wait_done and intel_dp_aux_xfer
Ville Syrjälä
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Fix null pointer dereference in intel_dp_aux_wait_done and intel_dp_aux_xfer
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/display: Fix null pointer dereference in intel_dp_aux_wait_done and intel_dp_aux_xfer
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts
Rahul Rameshbabu
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts (rev2)
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts (rev2)
Patchwork
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts
Jani Nikula
[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc-fixes tree
Stephen Rothwell
Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc-fixes tree
Ying Liu
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cdclk: Remove divider field from tables
Gustavo Sousa
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/cdclk: Remove divider field from tables
Patchwork
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/cdclk: Remove divider field from tables
Patchwork
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cdclk: Remove divider field from tables
Matt Roper
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cdclk: Remove divider field from tables
Ville Syrjälä
Earlier messages