intel-gfx  

Messages by Thread

• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Luca Coelho
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Tvrtko Ursulin
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Coelho, Luciano
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Tvrtko Ursulin
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Coelho, Luciano
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Rodrigo Vivi
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/2] Resolve suspend-resume racing with GuC destroy-context-worker Alan Previn
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Flush context destruction worker at suspend Alan Previn
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 2/2] drm/i915/guc: Close deregister-context race against CT-loss Alan Previn
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Resolve suspend-resume racing with GuC destroy-context-worker (rev7) Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [Patch v3 1/2] drm/i915: Move reg_in_range_table Matt Atwood
  • [Intel-gfx] [Patch v3 2/2] drm/i915: Introduce Wa_1401127433 Matt Atwood
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v3,1/2] drm/i915: Move reg_in_range_table Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [v3,1/2] drm/i915: Move reg_in_range_table Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v3,1/2] drm/i915: Move reg_in_range_table Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Luca Coelho
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160 Alan Previn
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v4,1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160 Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] Intel Arc 770m GPU won't load on Fedora 38 kernel versions > 6.4.12 Kevin Quillen
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel Arc 770m GPU won't load on Fedora 38 kernel versions > 6.4.12 Jani Nikula
• [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Jani Nikula
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Hamza Mahfooz
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Jani Nikula
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Maxime Ripard
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Javier Martinez Canillas
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Jani Nikula
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Javier Martinez Canillas
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Maxime Ripard
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Javier Martinez Canillas
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Patchwork
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Thomas Zimmermann
• Re: [Intel-gfx] 回复: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: correct the input parameter on _intel_dsb_commit() Jani Nikula
• [Intel-gfx] [RESEND] drm/i915/syncmap: squelch a sparse warning Jani Nikula
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND] drm/i915/syncmap: squelch a sparse warning Rodrigo Vivi
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/syncmap: squelch a sparse warning (rev2) Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/syncmap: squelch a sparse warning (rev2) Patchwork
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/syncmap: squelch a sparse warning (rev2) Jani Nikula
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: use PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL() for bool members Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: add bool type checks in PIPE_CONF_CHECK_* Jani Nikula
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: add bool type checks in PIPE_CONF_CHECK_* Rodrigo Vivi
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: use PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL() for bool members Rodrigo Vivi
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915: use PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL() for bool members Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 1/1] drm/i915/display: Don't use "proxy" headers Andy Shevchenko
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 1/1] drm/i915/display: Don't use "proxy" headers Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v1,1/1] drm/i915/display: Don't use "proxy" headers (rev2) Patchwork
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v1,1/1] drm/i915/display: Don't use "proxy" headers (rev2) Jani Nikula
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/hwmon: Fix static analysis tool errors in i915 hwmon Karthik Poosa
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/hwmon: Fix static analysis tool errors in i915 hwmon Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix static analysis tool errors in i915 hwmon Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/hwmon: Fix static analysis tool errors in i915 hwmon Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Luca Coelho
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Rodrigo Vivi
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Coelho, Luciano
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Rodrigo Vivi
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: handle uncore spinlock when not available Coelho, Luciano
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/4] pwm: rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep() Sean Young
• [Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915/dgfx: DGFX uses direct VBT pin mapping Lucas De Marchi
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dgfx: DGFX uses direct VBT pin mapping (rev2) Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier Jonathan Cavitt
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier (rev2) Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier (rev2) Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/gem: Atomically invalidate userptr on mmu-notifier (rev2) Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 0/4] Prepare intel_fb for Xe Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 1/4] drm/i915/display: use intel_bo_to_drm_bo in intel_fb.c Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 2/4] drm/i915/display: Convert intel_fb_modifier_to_tiling as non-static Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 4/4] drm/i915/display: Split i915 specific code away from intel_fb.c Jouni Högander
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 4/4] drm/i915/display: Split i915 specific code away from intel_fb.c Ville Syrjälä
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 3/4] drm/i915/display: Handle invalid fb_modifier in intel_fb_modifier_to_tiling Jouni Högander
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Prepare intel_fb for Xe (rev8) Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Prepare intel_fb for Xe (rev8) Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Prepare intel_fb for Xe (rev8) Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices Weixi Zhu
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices Christian König
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices Dave Airlie
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices zhuweixi
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices Christian König
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices zhuweixi
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices Christian König
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices Christian König
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices Zeng, Oak
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices Christian König
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices zhuweixi
  • [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 2/6] mm/gmem: add arch-independent abstraction to track address mapping status Weixi Zhu
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 2/6] mm/gmem: add arch-independent abstraction to track address mapping status zhuweixi
  • [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 5/6] mm/gmem: resolve VMA conflicts for attached peer devices Weixi Zhu
  • [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 1/6] mm/gmem: add heterogeneous NUMA node Weixi Zhu
  • [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 4/6] mm/gmem: add new syscall hmadvise() to issue memory hints for heterogeneous NUMA nodes Weixi Zhu
  • [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 3/6] mm/gmem: add GMEM (Generalized Memory Management) interface for external accelerators Weixi Zhu
  • [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 6/6] mm/gmem: extending Linux core MM to support unified virtual address space Weixi Zhu
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error Vignesh Raman
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error Manivannan Sadhasivam
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error Vignesh Raman
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error Manivannan Sadhasivam
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error Jani Nikula
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error Manivannan Sadhasivam
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error Vignesh Raman
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error Jani Nikula
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Fix compile error Vignesh Raman
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for PCI: qcom: Fix compile error Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for PCI: qcom: Fix compile error Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: cdclk/voltage_level cleanups and fixes Ville Syrjala
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/cdclk: s/-1/~0/ when dealing with unsigned values Ville Syrjala
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/cdclk: Give the squash waveform length a name Ville Syrjala
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/cdclk: Remove the assumption that cd2x div==2 when using squashing Ville Syrjala
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/cdclk: Rewrite cdclk->voltage_level selection to use tables Ville Syrjala
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/mtl: Fix voltage_level for cdclk==480MHz Ville Syrjala
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Split intel_ddi_compute_min_voltage_level() into platform variants Ville Syrjala
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/mtl: Calculate the correct voltage level from port_clock Ville Syrjala
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Simplify intel_ddi_compute_min_voltage_level() Ville Syrjala
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: cdclk/voltage_level cleanups and fixes Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: cdclk/voltage_level cleanups and fixes Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: wait for active idle event in i915_active_unlock_wait Andrzej Hajda
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: wait for active idle event in i915_active_unlock_wait Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix IP version of the WAs Balasubramani Vivekanandan
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix IP version of the WAs Gustavo Sousa
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix IP version of the WAs Matt Roper
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix IP version of the WAs Matt Roper
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Fix IP version of the WAs Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] QGV/SAGV related fixes Stanislav Lisovskiy
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Extract code required to calculate max qgv/psf gv point Stanislav Lisovskiy
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Add meaningful traces for QGV point info error handling Stanislav Lisovskiy
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Add meaningful traces for QGV point info error handling Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Disable SAGV on bw init, to force QGV point recalculation Stanislav Lisovskiy
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Disable SAGV on bw init, to force QGV point recalculation Stanislav Lisovskiy
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for QGV/SAGV related fixes Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for QGV/SAGV related fixes Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for QGV/SAGV related fixes Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for QGV/SAGV related fixes (rev2) Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for QGV/SAGV related fixes (rev2) Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for QGV/SAGV related fixes (rev2) Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160 Alan Previn
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v3,1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160 Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [v3,1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160 Patchwork
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160 Matt Roper
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Add missing tag for Wa_14019159160 Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dg2: Drop Wa_22014600077 Matt Roper
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dg2: Drop Wa_22014600077 Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dg2: Drop Wa_22014600077 Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/dg2: Drop Wa_22014600077 Patchwork
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/dg2: Drop Wa_22014600077 Matt Roper
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode Mika Kahola
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode Jani Nikula
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode Gustavo Sousa
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode Kahola, Mika
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode Gustavo Sousa
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode Kahola, Mika
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode Mika Kahola
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mode (rev2) Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] TTM improvement and amdgpu fix Christian König
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v3 Christian König
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: use GTT only as fallback for VRAM|GTT Christian König
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: use GTT only as fallback for VRAM|GTT Hamza Mahfooz
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: use GTT only as fallback for VRAM|GTT Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: use GTT only as fallback for VRAM|GTT Christian König
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v3 Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v3 Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v3 Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v3 Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders Ville Syrjala
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/mst: Fix .mode_valid_ctx() return values Ville Syrjala
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/mst: Fix .mode_valid_ctx() return values Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/mst: Reject modes that require the bigjoiner Ville Syrjala
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/mst: Reject modes that require the bigjoiner Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Clean up some DISPLAY_VER checks Ville Syrjala
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Clean up some DISPLAY_VER checks Jani Nikula
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders Patchwork
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders Jani Nikula
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders Ville Syrjälä
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders Jani Nikula
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders Ville Syrjälä
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders (rev2) Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders (rev2) Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders (rev2) Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix null pointer dereference in intel_dp_aux_wait_done and intel_dp_aux_xfer Kunwu Chan
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix null pointer dereference in intel_dp_aux_wait_done and intel_dp_aux_xfer Ville Syrjälä
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Fix null pointer dereference in intel_dp_aux_wait_done and intel_dp_aux_xfer Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/display: Fix null pointer dereference in intel_dp_aux_wait_done and intel_dp_aux_xfer Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts Rahul Rameshbabu
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts (rev2) Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts (rev2) Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts (rev2) Patchwork
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts Jani Nikula
• [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc-fixes tree Ying Liu
• [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/irq: Improve error logging for unexpected DE Misc interrupts Patchwork
• [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cdclk: Remove divider field from tables Gustavo Sousa
  • [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/cdclk: Remove divider field from tables Patchwork
  • [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/cdclk: Remove divider field from tables Patchwork
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cdclk: Remove divider field from tables Matt Roper
  • Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cdclk: Remove divider field from tables Ville Syrjälä

• Earlier messages