On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:18:17 +0100, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 17:39:54 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > > New requirements compared to 2.10 > > --------------------------------- > > * Libdrm >= 2.4.19 > > > The requirement is actually 2.4.21, afaict.
Can you give more details of what's required in 2.4.21 so that I can
make a commit message that explains it?
I made the bump to require 2.4.19 when I noticed a failure to compile
against 2.4.16 with an unresolved drm_intel_bo_emit_reloc_fence
function. So the commit message I wrote was:
Fix to require libdrm 2.4.19 or newer.
This is necessary for the drm_intel_bo_emit_reloc_fence function which
did not exist in 2.4.16 which is all we were requiring earlier.
I'd like something similar to accompany a commit requiring 2.4.21.
-Carl
--
carl.d.wo...@intel.com
pgpzs2nJFaTcY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
