On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:28:01 +0100 > Chris Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:58:40 +0100, Chris Wilson < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Does any one have a strong "this will damage my hardware" objection? > Are > > > the values safe enough for *any* device? > > > > Or perhaps a better question is: does anyone else feel confident enough > > in these defaults to ack them? ;-) Reviewed-by and tested-by a bonus. > > I can't vouch for any particular set of values, but Bryan's analysis > looks good to me; only a few of the values actually matter, and for > those having slightly longer delays should be safe. > Sounds like a soft ack to me. :) Chris, can you pick this up? Alternatively, guidance on how it should be reworked to be acceptable would be appreciated. Thanks, -Olof
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
