On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:26 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2011 13:20:55 -0400 > Adam Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nitpick: Probably either this comment (and its mate in > > gen6_init_clock_gating) should just refer to PCH generically if this is > > going to keep being true, or this instance of it should read Panther > > Point instead of ibx/cpt. Assuming wikipedia isn't lying to me about > > chipset names, anyway. > > I hope it's not true for PPT (my current IVB system uses CPT), but it > gets split out in the next patch anyway...
Fair. Wasn't sure if there were ivb/cpt machines. Objection cheerfully withdrawn! - ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
