On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:03:33 -0700, Jesse Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
> + udelay(100); udelay isn't my favorite function to use while waiting for hardware to clean up. Do we expect to get into this path regularly? Is it just when hardware is broken? How many times around this loop do we go before things work? If we only occasionally enter this loop, and if we end up going around several times, it seems like using msleep would be nicer to the system. -- [email protected]
pgpzGJaq04T6S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
