On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:52:42 -0700 Ben Widawsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> While I think the previous code is correct, it was hard to follow and > hard to debug. Since we already have a ring abstraction, might as well > use it to handle the semaphore updates and compares. > > I don't expect this code to make semaphores better or worse, but you > never know... > > Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > Cc: Eric Anholt <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]> I just realized I forgot to use the new invalid #define in the code. I'll resubmit that tomorrow. Ben _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
