On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 11:24 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:00:14 -0400, Adam Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This code is still present in Linus' tree, and still crap. Any > > reviewers for this series? > > It all looks reasonable to me, and Chris reviewed or ack'd every patch > but #4, which looks reasonable on the surface to me. > > Are you thinking this should land in 3.1? Or 3.2?
#1 should definitely land in 3.1 if at all possible. The rest can wait I guess. I'd still like to get more dialogue about #4 from Rolf or someone else with multifunc sdvo. That, or such a device on my shelf. I can buy one if someone knows what I should buy. - ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
