On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:02:42 +0200, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Use pp_control instead of re-reading? Could, but you'll note a later patch eliminates both pp_status and pp_control local variables, so I didn't bother to clean this up when refactoring. > dp_aux_ch does the low-level io for the below, so either this one or the > below three hunks look a bit redundant. Yeah, probably not necessary. I just added checks everywhere I could think of to try and figure out where power was not being applied when needed. Should I bother to include this patch in the series at all? It's purely for diagnostics to make sure the panel is powered during all aux channel transactions. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpy08LpplqB7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
