On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:01:11 +0200, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> Looks like a patch useful for fixing up this mess, but I don't quite see
> the point of merging this given that you fix things for real in the next
> one ...

Good point. In the development process, this was the patch which made
things work, so it's purely an artifact of that. I'll merge this with
the subsequent patch.

-- 
keith.pack...@intel.com

Attachment: pgpl6V7BFvGbA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to