On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:26:26 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> Was just preserving the old code; I think you've fixed this issue > already in another patch (looks like it's another one that's been there > since we first brought up ILK?). I think the only case where we select the '96MHz' clock is the same case where we hard-code the actually clock for DP. I was just wondering if you had special info that I couldn't find. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgp4D4yWZ9jjz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
