On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:18:30 +0200, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > Hi Keith, > > This patch isn't in your -next pull. This papers over a spurious -EFAULT > in the pwrite/pread paths that actually gets hit in the wild. The real fix > in the form of a almost complete rewrite of the pwrite/pread paths won't > be ready for 3.2.
We had several comments wondering whether writing zeros was OK as this occurs before some potential error returns that should leave the buffer unmodified. I didn't have a better suggestion, but that seems pretty sketchy to me. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgp0coKxYcZlZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
