On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:12:03 -0800, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> No this one should be looking at the bottom bit, so I think it's ok.
Sorry, bad mail edit. There's one << 15 in both force_wake_mt_put and
force_wake_mt_get and they both need to be << 16:
+void __gen6_gt_force_wake_mt_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ int count;
+
+ count = 0;
+ while (count++ < 50 && (I915_READ_NOTRACE(FORCEWAKE_MT_ACK) & 1))
+ udelay(10);
+
+ I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(FORCEWAKE_MT, (1<<15) | 1);
<<16
+ POSTING_READ(FORCEWAKE_MT);
+
+ count = 0;
+ while (count++ < 50 && (I915_READ_NOTRACE(FORCEWAKE_MT_ACK) & 1) == 0)
+ udelay(10);
+}
+
...
+void __gen6_gt_force_wake_mt_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(FORCEWAKE_MT, (1<<15) | 0);
<<16
+ POSTING_READ(FORCEWAKE_MT);
+}
+
> Cool, hope it'll help others too.
Let me know when you hear back from the VPG folks about how we're
supposed to know which method to use.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgp8cA2QUGZiq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
