On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:00:22AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > In order to correctly account for reserving space in the GTT and fences > for a batch buffer, we need to independently track whether the fence is > pinned due to a fenced GPU access in the batch from from whether the > buffer is pinned in the aperture. Currently we count the fenced as > pinned if the buffer has already been seen in the execbuffer. This leads > to a false accounting of available fence registers, causing frequent > mass evictions. Worse, if coupled with the change to make > i915_gem_object_get_fence() report EDADLK upon fence starvation, the > batchbuffer can fail with only one fence required... > > Fixes intel-gpu-tools/tests/gem_fenced_exec_thrash > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38735 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > Tested-by: Paul Neumann <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]
How embarassing, I've re-reviewed the wrong patch without noticing. Anyway, still looks good and I like the pin_count moved to the fence quite a bit more ... Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> -- Daniel Vetter Mail: [email protected] Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
