On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:55:58PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:24:54 +0100, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> > And track the existence of such a binding similar to the aliasing
> > ppgtt case. Speeds up binding/unbinding in the common case where we
> > only need a ppgtt binding (which is accessed in a cpu coherent fashion
> > by the gpu) and no gloabl gtt binding (which needs uc writes for the
> > ptes).
> 
> For one month from mid-june to mid-july, Mesa master was setting
> I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT in the workaround pipe control.  That was changed to
> be _INSTRUCTION, because _GTT caused kernel oopses, and query objects
> had already been doing _INSTRUCTION since forever.  There are no uses of
> MI_STOREs in the driver.
> 
> I'd say the minor ABI change potential in here is safe.

Can I interpret this as an Acked-by for the (fixed up and actually tested)
patch?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: [email protected]
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to