On 2011-12-06 09:14-0200 Eugeni Dodonov wrote:

2011/12/6 Alan W. Irwin <[email protected]>
      On 2011-12-05 23:03-0200 Eugeni Dodonov wrote:

            Hi,
             
            We’d like to announce Intel 2011Q4 graphics package, focused on 
performance and stability improvements in the
            Intel Linux Graphics
            stack.
             
            Please check http://intellinuxgraphics.org/2011Q4.html for the 
recommended stack, list of new features and
            known issues.

            I'd also like to thank all the developers, community, our users and 
testers for helping us to improve the
            drivers. Thanks a lot for all
            your work, help and support!

            And as usual, if you find any new issues, please let as know by 
filing bugs following the
            http://intellinuxgraphics.org/how_to_report_bug.html guidelines.

            Thanks,
            Eugeni Dodonov
            Intel Open Source Technology Center


Hi Eugeni:

My primary interest in Intel graphics is I just want something that is
completely stable for a mostly 2D desktop with the ability to play
some low-end 3D games.  Thus, I have been reasonably content with what
I get from Debian stable for my g33 graphics hardware, but I would
like to upgrade to Debian testing for a number of reasons.  However,
what's been holding me back from that upgrade is concern that g33 has
not been validated for a while by the Intel team (e.g., no mention of
g33 for your first quarterly release this year).

Therefore, I was very glad to see g33 mentioned as one of the
validated platforms both for this release and also for the 3rd
quarterly release this year so my hopes that g33 will work with no big
issues for Debian testing are much higher than they were. However,
testing results for only some (Pineview 32-bit, and
Sandybridge/Ivybridge for 64-bit) of your validated platforms are
linked at the above URL.  Is there a link you can give me for the g33
test results (preferably 64 bit)?


Hi Alan,

for g33, it is not being the main focus of the release validation and testing 
lately, so it receives limited validation, checking for
regressions mostly.

However, for all the kernel/mesa/drm/2d releases, the expectation is for it to work in a 
"no regressions" mode. It should be similar to
pineview for most test cases and workloads.

Having said that, we do intend to provide a good support for it. So if you 
observe any new issues or bugs which are not previously
filled in our bugzilla, please, let us know. Even if we do not focus on full 
validation and testing for it as part of the stack
release, we still do intend to have a good level of functionality for it. So if 
there are stability or regression issues, or its
functionality under Debian testing is somehow worse than with Debian stable, 
we'd like to know about it.


Thanks to you and Gordon for your up-front replies.  I am disappointed
you currently have such limited resources for release validation, and
for your Linux customer's sake I hope you can convince Intel to
give you some additional limited resources (man-hours and hardware) to make
that validation effort more comprehensive.  After all, the Intel
X stack is being constantly developed to handle new hardware and fix
bugs for old hardware, and without release testing for a wider variety
of hardware some regressions are inevitably going to creep in for
hardware that currently has limited release validation or no release
validation at all.  Thus, the inevitable result of your currently
limited resources for release validation is concerned Linux customers
like me who are forced to be extremely cautious about software
"upgrades".  That is a characteristic historically associated with
Windows users, and we don't want that to become the norm for Linux
users as well!

That said, I will try to help you out where I can. This g33 computer
is used by two people simultaneously in a home office (one directly
and one via an X terminal) as a production box so it will take a while
before we can find a convenient time to upgrade to Debian testing, but
when we do so (probably one or two months from now) I will get back to
you with an upgrade report (whether positive or negative) for the g33
graphics of that principal box.  If all goes well for that upgrade, we
also plan to upgrade the nettop computer we use for the X-terminal
from Debian stable to Debian testing and give you a similar upgrade
report for the 945GM/GMS/GME graphics of that system which are
somewhat older than the g33 graphics of our principal box.

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca).

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state
implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time
Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting
software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project
(unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net);
and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to