They're not really errors (well actually I don't know; I don't understand _DSM and _MUX well enough to say, but I do know they spam people's logs and seem to be harmless).
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c index cb91210..01c671f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c @@ -182,8 +182,6 @@ static void intel_dsm_platform_mux_info(void) DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(" hpd mux info: %s\n", intel_dsm_mux_type(info->buffer.pointer[3])); } - } else { - DRM_ERROR("MUX INFO call failed\n"); } out: @@ -208,7 +206,6 @@ static bool intel_dsm_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev) ret = intel_dsm(dhandle, INTEL_DSM_FN_SUPPORTED_FUNCTIONS, 0); if (ret < 0) { - DRM_ERROR("failed to get supported _DSM functions\n"); return false; }
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
