On 3/13/12 2:02 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
However, for the overall goal of the patch sequence, I think it is a good thing to not use MTRRs when PAT is available. Part of me is wondering if we shouldn't simply turn off the X86_FEATURE_PAT in boot_cpu_info when PAT is disabled.
It looks like the only user of cpu_has_pat is the PAT code itself, so that should be safe in the sense of not breaking anyone's expectations. And it would avoid needing to export another symbol. I like.
Will respin to do that, with better descriptions. - ajax _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
