On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:39:37PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:33:54 +0200 > Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This patch looks more like a random set of registers than interrupt > > definitions. Also it's missing the sob line. Please clarify a bit what > > this is about. > > Should probably be mashed in with the IRQ patch; do you want to do that > when you apply?
On re-reading it looks like they're indeed all irq related - I've been confused with all this SPRITE stuff in them. So I guess just your sob line is awol. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: [email protected] Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
