On 06/10/2016 07:58, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
On ke, 2016-10-05 at 17:53 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 05/10/2016 17:50, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 05/10/2016 16:07, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
On ke, 2016-10-05 at 13:33 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Use types of more appropriate size in struct
intel_watermark_params to save 512 bytes of .rodata.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
The code does seem to use datatypes very sloppily. Where did you
pick
up these?
I was just nosing around in .rodata and wondered why a huge table
of
zeros. :)
Oops no, that was the cxsr table which stood out so much. After I
found
that one I nosed around some more to see which ones look wasteful.
I rather meant how did you deduce the right datatype sizes?
Oh right, I've looked at the values stored in them and got extra
confidence when the compiler did not complain.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
