On ti, 2016-10-11 at 12:03 -0700, Robert Bragg wrote:
> > > + case DRM_I915_PERF_PROP_MAX:
> > > + BUG();
> > We already handle this case above, but I guess we still need this in
> > order to silence gcc...
> right, and preferable to having a default: case, for the future compiler
> warning to handle any new properties here.
Please, do use MISSING_CASE instead. Daniel is known to get upset for
far less ;)
Generally consensus is that BUG() is used only when there're no other options
to back out.
Open Source Technology Center
Intel-gfx mailing list