On 2016.10.20 09:02:45 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Yeah, I think anything that touches i915 code should get merged through > drm-intel directly with the usual process. Only exception is when gvt has > a functional depency and it's a small patch, then I think we can sometimes > merge i915 core patches through gvt, with an ack from Jani or me (and > still proper review and CI and everything ofc). But that should be the > rare exception.
That's fair enough for me. One prepared change is to fix gvt header issue you've listed. As it touches intel_gvt.h in i915, I'll send that seperately first (https://github.com/01org/gvt-linux/commit/b6a1ca7571ae45186394e555dc420481c1a9dba5) -- Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
