Op 14-11-16 om 17:35 schreef ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> When we end up not recomputing the cdclk, we need to populate
> intel_state->cdclk with the "atomic_cdclk_freq" instead of the
> current cdclk_freq. When no pipes are active, the actual cdclk_freq
> may be lower than what the configuration of the planes and
> pipes would require from the point of view of the software state.
>
> This fixes bogus WARNS from skl_max_scale() which is trying to check
> the plane software state against the cdclk frequency. So any time
> it got called during DPMS off for instance, we might have tripped
> the warn if the current mode would have required a higher than
> minimum cdclk.
>
> v2: Drop the dev_cdclk stuff (Maarten)
>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com>
> Cc: bruno.pag...@ens-lyon.org
> Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blue...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl>
> Cc: Joseph Yasi <joe.y...@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> (v1)
> Tested-by: Joseph Yasi <joe.y...@gmail.com> (v1)
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 1a617b77658e ("drm/i915: Keep track of the cdclk as if all crtc's were 
> active.")
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98214
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index e48d9571c99d..70f3f0b70263 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -14027,8 +14027,9 @@ static int intel_modeset_checks(struct 
> drm_atomic_state *state)
>  
>               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("New cdclk calculated to be atomic %u, actual 
> %u\n",
>                             intel_state->cdclk, intel_state->dev_cdclk);
> -     } else
> +     } else {
>               to_intel_atomic_state(state)->cdclk = 
> dev_priv->atomic_cdclk_freq;
> +     }
>  
>       intel_modeset_clear_plls(state);
>  
> @@ -14129,8 +14130,9 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>  
>               if (ret)
>                       return ret;
> -     } else
> -             intel_state->cdclk = dev_priv->cdclk_freq;
> +     } else {
> +             intel_state->cdclk = dev_priv->atomic_cdclk_freq;
> +     }
>  
>       ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_planes(dev, state);
>       if (ret)

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to