On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:56:16PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 28-11-16 om 18:37 schreef ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Each DSPARB register can house bits for two separate pipes, hence
> > we must protect the registers during reprogramming so that parallel
> > FIFO reconfigurations happening simultaneosly on multiple pipes won't
> > corrupt each others values.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 ++++++
> > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > index 0fba4bb5655e..c98032e9112b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > @@ -811,6 +811,7 @@ static int i915_driver_init_early(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> > spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->mm.object_stat_lock);
> > spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->mmio_flip_lock);
> > + spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->wm.dsparb_lock);
> Can we make sure all wm updates are done with dev_priv->wm.wm_mutex held
> instead?
We can't grab a mutex from the vblank evade critical section. We'd have
to hold the mutex across the whole thing then. Not sure if that would be
a good or a bad thing.
>
> gen9 wm's and ilk wm's use that mutex, for similar reasons.
> > mutex_init(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> > mutex_init(&dev_priv->modeset_restore_lock);
> > mutex_init(&dev_priv->av_mutex);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index 9d808b706824..75439e9a67f7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -2169,6 +2169,9 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
> > } sagv_status;
> >
> > struct {
> > + /* protects DSPARB registers on pre-g4x/vlv/chv */
> > + spinlock_t dsparb_lock;
> > +
> > /*
> > * Raw watermark latency values:
> > * in 0.1us units for WM0,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 24d85a4e4ed3..9f25f2195a6a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -1215,6 +1215,8 @@ static void vlv_pipe_set_fifo_size(struct intel_crtc
> > *crtc)
> > pipe_name(crtc->pipe), sprite0_start,
> > sprite1_start, fifo_size);
> >
> > + spin_lock(&dev_priv->wm.dsparb_lock);
> > +
> > switch (crtc->pipe) {
> > uint32_t dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
> > case PIPE_A:
> > @@ -1271,6 +1273,10 @@ static void vlv_pipe_set_fifo_size(struct intel_crtc
> > *crtc)
> > default:
> > break;
> > }
> > +
> > + POSTING_READ(DSPARB);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock(&dev_priv->wm.dsparb_lock);
> > }
> >
> > #undef VLV_FIFO
>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
