On 05/11/2012 05:54 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
@@ -1800,6 +1800,7 @@ struct drm_ioctl_desc i915_ioctls[] = {
DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_OVERLAY_ATTRS, intel_overlay_attrs,
DRM_MASTER|DRM_CONTROL_ALLOW|DRM_UNLOCKED),
DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY, intel_sprite_set_colorkey,
DRM_MASTER|DRM_CONTROL_ALLOW|DRM_UNLOCKED),
DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_GET_SPRITE_COLORKEY, intel_sprite_get_colorkey,
DRM_MASTER|DRM_CONTROL_ALLOW|DRM_UNLOCKED),
+ DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(I915_GEM_WAIT, i915_gem_wait_ioctl, DRM_UNLOCKED),
};
I was just wondering (not directly related to this patch, but more
thinking on the overall gem flow) - don't we want to use DRM_AUTH here?
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
