On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:16:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:07:46AM -0700, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > > Since this reported issue is happening in this double error path, I'd > > rather a patch that fixes it without disabling the more generic NAK > > path. Maybe something like this: > > Hm, good suggestion. This way, if we get a NAK but no issues later on, > we'll still fail faster if gmbus detected that no device is responding. > Which should speed up boot a bit. I'll run this past the bug reporter.
We're lucky, and the modified patch tested ok by the bug reporter. I'll follow up with v2, please smash your r-b onto it if you're satisfied. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: [email protected] Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
