On ke, 2017-01-11 at 21:09 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Same test as previously for the per-process GTT instead applied to the
> global GTT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
<SNIP>
> @@ -218,28 +209,94 @@ static int igt_ppgtt_fill(void *arg)
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, on, &objects, batch_pool_link) {
> list_del(&obj->batch_pool_link);
> - vma = vma_lookup(obj, &ppgtt->base);
> - if (!IS_ERR(vma))
> + vma = vma_lookup(obj, vm);
> + if (!IS_ERR(vma) && !i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma))
Reasoning is worthy a commenting here as discussed in IRC.
> i915_vma_close(vma);
>
> i915_gem_object_put(obj);
> }
> }
> -err:
<SNIP>
> +static int igt_ggtt_fill(void *arg)
> +{
<SNIP>
> + mutex_lock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> + drm_mm_for_each_hole(node, &ggtt->base.mm, this_start, this_end) {
> + u64 this_size;
> +
> + if (ggtt->base.mm.color_adjust)
> + ggtt->base. mm.color_adjust(node, 0,
You somehow managed to add space --^
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
